Main Article Content


The study examined the effect of performance appraisal practices on teachers’ job performance, and sought to investigate the effect of 1) target setting 2) performance monitoring and 3) employee feedback on teachers’ job performance. A cross-sectional survey design with a mixed-method approach was adopted. The target population of the study was composed of 211 respondents spread across four private universal secondary schools; 207 teachers and four head teachers; and a sample size of 189 respondents with 185 teachers and four head teachers selected using a simple random sampling approach coupled with a fish-bowl technique, while census inquiry was adopted to select head teachers. A self-designed closed-ended questionnaire was administered to collect data from teachers while an interview guide was adopted to collect data from head teachers. The CVI obtained for the instrument was .90 and a reliability index of 931 Cronbach alpha co-efficient. Data was analyzed using frequencies, percentages, and simple regression. Findings indicate that target setting (β = 0.375, p< 0.05), performance monitoring (β = 0.435, p< 0.05) and employee feedback (β = 0.375, p< 0.05) had very strong significant effect on teachers’ job performance. The study concludes that performance appraisal practices can significantly aid teachers’ job performance in private USE schools if well handled in terms of comprehensiveness, clarity and timeliness. It recommends that target setting should involve teachers and their individual differences be reflected; academic meetings should be held monthly and performance support should be extended to teachers; whilst feedback given to teachers ought to be timely, comprehensive and interactive.


performance appraisal performance management performance monitoring teacher appraisal target setting employee feedback

Article Details

How to Cite
Wamimbi, F., & Bisaso, M. (2021). Performance Appraisal Practices and Teachers’ Job Performance in Private Universal Secondary Schools in Manafwa District, Uganda. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 4(1), 46–63.


  1. Agesa, P. (2012). Performance appraisal systems in schools and their impact on performance of teachers. A case study of secondary schools in Teso District.
  2. Affum-Osei, E., Acquaah, E. & Acheampong, P. (2015). The relationship between organizational commitment and demographic variables: Evidence from a commercial bank in Ghana. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management 5(12):769-778.
  3. Ali, M. H. A. M. & Opatha, H. H. D. N. P. (2008). Performance appraisal system and business performance: An empirical study in Sri Lankan apparel industry. Sri Lankan Journal of Human Resource Management,2(1), 74-90.
  4. Ali, S. B. (2012). The effect of employees’ performance appraisal procedure on their intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(2), 161-168.
  5. Akampurira, A. (2010). The effectiveness of teachers' performance appraisal in secondary schools in Kabale Municipality.
  6. Aswathappa, K. (2003). Organizational behavior. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House.
  7. Mehtabul, A., & Kingdon, G. G. (2015). Assessing teacher quality in India. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.001.
  8. Busingye, M. (2016). Appraisal system and teacher performance in Nagongera National Teachers’ College. Kampala, Uganda: Makerere University.
  9. Armstrong, M. (2006). A handbook of personnel management practice. Kogan.
  10. Baron, A. (2018). Performance management: The new realities. London Institute of Personnel and Development.
  11. Cardy, R. (2014). Performance management: Concepts, skills and exercises. New York: Amonk.
  12. Education Service Commission (2020). Annual Performance Report Financial year 2018/19.
  13. Ganimian, A, J., & Murnane, R. J. (2014). Improving educational outcomes in developing countries: Lessons from rigorous impact evaluations. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  14. Glewee, P., & Muralidharan, K., (2015). Improving school education outcomes in developing countries: Evidence. Knowledge Gaps, and Policy Implications.
  15. Glewwe, P., & K. Muralidharan. (2016). Improving Education Outcomes in Developing Countries. Handbook of the Economics of Education no. 5:653-743. doi: 10.1016/B978-0
  16. Horvath, H. (2015). Classroom Assignment Policies and Implications for Teacher Value Added Estimation.
  17. Kerwin, J. T., & Thornton, R. (2017). Making the grade: The trade-off between efficiency and effectiveness in improving student learning.
  18. Lutheran, F. (2011). Reinforce for performance: The need to go beyond pay and even reward. Academy of Management Executive, 13, 49-55.
  19. Lydiah and Nasanga (2015). Appraisal practices and job performance in organizations.
  20. Manafwa DLG (2016). District Education sector report. Manafwa
  21. Muhammad, F. (2013) Role of performance appraisal system on employees’ motivation. Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 8, 66-83.
  22. Muweesi, C. (2018). Epistemological dynamics and incorporation of appraisal practices in Kampala Archdiocesan secondary schools. Department of Education, Faculty of Science and Education, Busitema University, Busitema, Uganda.
  23. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (2008). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. Omoeva, C., & Gale, C. (2016). Universal, but not free: Household schooling costs and equity effects of Uganda’s Universal Secondary Education policy. International Journal of Educational Development, 50.
  25. Olembo, et al (1992). Employee appraisal practices on job evaluation.
  26. Selvarajan, T. T., & Cloninger, A. P. (2011). Can performance appraisals motivate employee to improve performance? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-22.
  27. Singh, S. P., & Rana, S. (2014). Impact of performance appraisal on the motivation of teachers of professional institutions. Dahradun.
  28. Smith, R. (2013). Preparing for appraisal, self-evaluation for teachers in primary schools and secondary schools. Lancaster Framework
  29. Ssenabulya, R. (2016). Appraisal practices and teacher performance in secondary schools in Kampala. Kampala, Uganda: Makerere University.
  30. Ugandan Ministry of Education and Sports. (2014). Teacher issues in Uganda: A shared vision for an effective teachers’ policy. UNESCO - IIEP Pôle de Dakar.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.