Bureaucratic Theory and Its Influence on Workers’ Productivity Improvement in Nigerian Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53449/ije.v2i2.86Keywords:
bureaucracy, productivity improvement, technical competence, impersonality, authority, universitiesAbstract
The study examined the contribution of bureaucratic theory to workers’ productivity improvement in Nigerian universities. A descriptive research design of the survey type was used for the study. A sample of 10 universities in the south west Nigeria – five state-owned and five federal-owned – using simple random sampling technique was selected. Also, simple random sampling was used to select 20 respondents including academic and non-academic staff (senior staff) amounting to 200 respondents. The study developed and used a questionnaire titled: “Bureaucratic Principles and Workers’ Productivity Questionnaire (BPWQ)” with a reliability correlation coefficient (r) of 0.90. Multiple regression analysis was employed to analyse the data, while the null hypotheses developed for the study were tested at .05 level of significance. The findings revealed that there was significant composite influence of bureaucratic principles on workers’ productivity improvement in Nigerian universities. Also, there was significant influence of division of labour and specialization, hierarchy of authority, stipulated rules and regulation, records, impersonal orientation, and employment and promotion of staff based on technical competence on workers’ productivity improvement in Nigerian universities. It is therefore recommended among others that skilful and qualified workers should be employed at every level in Nigerian universities, their appointments and promotions should be based on merit and competence as established by bureaucratic principles.
Downloads
References
Agboola, T. O. (2016). Bureaucratic politics and policy development: Issues and challenges. African Journal of International Relations, 10(2), 11-19.
Alornyeku, L. (2011). Rethinking public services in Nigeria. Ibadan: Carligate Publishing Company Limited.
Argyris, R. (2004). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Aule, O., & Odo, U. (2015). The effect of over rigidity of rules in public organisations in Ondo State. Review of Public Administration and Management, 4(8), 41-50.
Ayodele, T. (2015). The implication of bureaucracy in public organization in Lagos State. International Journal of Management, 4(3), 105-117.
Banjoko, S. (2006). Managing corporate reward systems. Lagos: Pumark Nigeria Limited.
Blau, P. M. (1956). Bureaucracy in modern society. New York: Random House.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation, London: Routledge.
Cato, S. T., & Gordon, J. (2009). Relationship of the strategic vision alignment to employee productivity and student enrolment. Research in Higher Education Journal, 7, 1-20.
Charles, E. (2011). Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures). Industrial and Corporate Change:2(6), 104-117.
Cloke, K., & Goldsmith, I. (2002). The end of management and the rise of organizational democracy. New York: Jossey-Brass.
Danjuma, B., & Philip, A. (2016). Bureaucracy and development in Nigeria: Issues and perspectives. Journal of Developing Country Studies, 1(2), 1-11.
Danjuma, H., & Kamaruddin, O. (2014). The implications of effective application of bureaucracy in public organisations in Nigeria. Journal of Developing Country Studies, 3(2), 32-41.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1968). Some reflections on the variability of development and organizational structures, Administrative Science Quarterly 13(3), 491 – 497.
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance 26(3), 347 - 368.
Gouldner, A. W. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Hill, C., Jones, G., & Schilling, M. (2014). Strategic management: theory: An integrated approach. Cengage Learning.
Hong, J. Y. (1995). Impact of employee benefits on work motivation and productivity. International Journal of Career Management 3(4), 10 – 14.
Ingraham. P. W., Joyce, P. G., & Donahue, A. D. (2003). Government performance: Why management matters. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Islam, R., & Ismail, A. Z. H. (2008). Employee motivation: A Malaysian perspective. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 2, 344 – 362.
Kim, D. (2006). Employee motivation: Just ask your employees. Seoul Journal of Business, 4, 20 - 34.
Lazer, D. (2002). How to maintain innovation.gov in a networked world? Digital Government Workshop at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Retrieved from:
http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/cbg/dgworkshop/lazer.pdf
Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2001). Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Mashaw, J. L. (1983). Bureaucratic justice: Managing social security disability claims. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.
McNutt, P. A. (2002). The economics of public choice. Edward Elgar Pub.
Morales, C., Cory, C., & Bozell, D. (2001). A comparative efficiency study between a live lecture and a web-based live-switched multi-camera streaming video distance learning instructional unit. Proceedings of the 2001 Information Resources Management Association International Conference. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 63 - 66.
Murhammed, A., & Nasir, O. (2014). The effect of bureaucracy on coordination in civil service in Kaduna State. Journal of Business and Management, 6(4), 171 - 192.
Mullins, L. J. (2010). Management and organizational behaviour (9th ed). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Nistotskaya, M., & Luciana, C. (2015). Bureaucratic structure, regulatory quality, and entrepreneurship in a comparative perspective: Cross-sectional and panel data evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(6), 143 - 155.
Obadara, O. E. (2012). Fundamentals of educational administration. Lagos: Gafets Publications.
Obdulio, D. L. (2014). How management can improve corporate culture in order to have an ffective work environment. Trade Publication, 75(8), 144 - 152.
Oswald, A., Proto, E., & Sgroi, D. (2015). Happiness and productivity. Journal of Labor Economics 33(4), 789 – 822.
Peters, B. G. (2010). The politics of bureaucracy: An introduction to comparative public administration. New York: Routledge.
Prasada, R. (2006). Motivation model for improving productivity in manufacturing unit: A success story. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 3, 430 - 436.
Sharma, M. S., & Sharma, M. V. (2014). Employee engagement to enhance productivity in current scenario. International Journal of Commerce, Business and Management, 3(4), 595 - 604.
Singh, P., Bhandarker, A., & Rai, S. (2012). Millennial and the workplace: challenges for architecting the organizations of tomorrow. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
Smith, K. (1997). Economic infrastructures and innovation systems. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations. 2, 86 - 106.
Stewart, R. (2009). The reality of management. USA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Vinesh, K. (2014). Role of training and development in an organizational development. International Journal of Management and International Business Studies. 4(2), 213 -220.
Weber, M. (1947). Essays on sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, F. A. (2009). Organizational behaviour: A critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zahra, S. (2014). Employee training and its effect on employees’ job motivation and commitment: Developing and proposing a conceptual model. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(9), 60 - 68.
