Constructing a Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Data Analysis in Social Science Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53449/ije.v2i1.77Keywords:
concepts, conceptual framework, control, dependent, independent, mediation, moderation, variablesAbstract
The article proposes how to construct a conceptual framework in social science research using the quantitative paradigm. The purpose of the paper is to provide a guideline for drawing a conceptual framework to students writing proposals based on scientific justification for data analysis. The paper explains how constructs are interlinked to develop a conceptual framework. The article argues that a conceptual framework is not a fixed network of variables but possesses ontological, epistemological, and methodological assumptions and each concept within a conceptual framework plays an ontological or epistemological role. The ontological assumptions explain how knowledge is or what knowledge is, the epistemological assumptions relate to how things really are done and how things certainly work in an assumed reality, and the methodological assumptions relate to the process of building the conceptual framework and assessing what it can tell us about the real world. Therefore, the conceptual frame shows how variables are interlinked, how analysis will be carried out and how the subsequent model will look like. In conclusion, the conceptual framework is not a form of fixed diagram but portrays the kind of analysis that will be or has been carried out in a study.
Downloads
References
Akpabio, I. I. (2015). Improving utilisation of conceptual and theoretical framework in nursing research. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 21(1), 87-91. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.4314/gjpas.v21i1.11
Arp, R., Smith, B., & Spear, A. D. (2015). Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices (2nd Ed.). Global Text Project. Available at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3
Casanave, C. P., & Li, Y. (2015). Novices’ struggles with conceptual and theoretical framing in writing dissertations and papers for publication. Publications 3, 104-119. doi:10.3390/ publications3020104
Dieronitou, I. (2014). The ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. International Journal of Economics, 2(10), 1-17.
Fairchild, A., & MacKinnon, D. (2009). A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects. Prevention Science, 10(2), 87-99.
Farooq, R., & Vij, S. (2017). Moderating variables in business research. IUP Journal of Business Strategy, 14(4), 34-54.
Flannelly, L. T., Flannelly, K. J., & Jankowski, K. R. (2014). Independent, dependent, and other variables in healthcare and chaplaincy research. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 20(4), 161-170. doi: 10.1080/08854726.2014.959374
Ginty, A. T. (2013). Psychometric properties, In: Gellman M. D., Turner J. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. New York, USA: Springer.
Hudon, A., Gervais, M. J., & Hunt, M. (2015). The contribution of conceptual frameworks to knowledge translation interventions in physical therapy. Physical therapy, 95(4), 630-639. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130483
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49-62. https://doi.org/10. 1177/ 160940690900800406
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2010). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, USA: Sage.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles, USA: Sage.
Kanste, O., Miettunen, J., & Kyngäs, H. (2007). Psychometric properties of the multifactor leadership questionnaire among nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(2), 201-212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04100.x
Kitchel, T., & Ball, A. L. (2014). Quantitative theoretical and conceptual framework use in agricultural education research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(1), 186-199. doi: 10.5032/jae.2014.01186
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Michielsen, M., & Moeyaert, B. (2009). Employee retention: Organisational and personal perspectives. Vocations and Learning, 2(3), 195-215. doi 10.1007/s12186-009-9024-7
Lee, H. (2007). Essentials of behavioral science research. Morrisville, USA: www.lulu.com
Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 9, 181-213.
MacKinnon, D. P., & Luecken, L. J. (2011). Statistical analysis for identifying mediating variables in public health dentistry interventions. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 71, S37-S46.
Mishra, D. P. (2010). Analysing the relationship between dependent and independent variables in marketing: a comparison of multiple regression with path analysis. Innovative Marketing, 6(3), 113-120.
Namazi, M., & Namazi, N. R. (2016). Conceptual analysis of moderator and mediator variables in business research. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 540-554.
Onen, D. (2016). Appropriate Conceptualisation: The foundation of any solid quantitative research. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 14(1), 28-38.
Pauline V. Rosenau, P.V. (2015). In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
Pokharel, B. (2009). Concept mapping in social research. Tribhuvan University Journal, 26(1), 1-6.
Pourhoseingholi, M. A., Baghestani, A. R., & Vahedi, M. (2012). How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench, 5(2), 79-83.
Rocco, T. S. & Plathotnik, M. S. (2009). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical Frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Resource Development Review, 8(1), 120-130 doi: 10.1177/1534484309332617
Smith, B. (2003). Ontology. In L. Floridi (Ed.), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 155–166.
Souza, A. C. D., Alexandre, N. M. C., & Guirardello, E. D. B. (2017). Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 26(3), 649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
Svinicki, M. D. (2010). A guidebook on conceptual frameworks for research in engineering education. Rigorous Research in Engineering Education, 1-53.
Tamene, E. H. (2016). Theorizing conceptual framework. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 50-56.
Tennis, J. (2008). Epistemology, theory, and methodology in knowledge organisation: Toward a classification, metatheory, and research framework. Knowledge Organisation, 35(2/3), 102-112.
Turkington, C., & Harris, J. (2006). The encyclopedia of learning disabilities. New York, USA: Infobase Publishing.
Ültanir, E. (2012). An epistemologic glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195-212.
Uzun, K. (2016). Critical investigation of a qualitative research article from ontological and epistemological perspectives. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2(3), 959-967.
Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 5(3), 65-72.
