Academic Staff Research Orientations in Uganda: A Study of Makerere University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53449/ije.v1i1.38Keywords:
academic research, research orientations, disciplinary fieldsAbstract
Academic staff research orientations have become subject to growing interest in the context of research-led universities. Whereas a number of studies have explored research orientations in higher education, research literature on the subject deals typically with the topic in the context of European and American universities. As such, studies delving in the way academics conceptualize research orientations across disciplinary fields remain few, at least in the context of Sub-Saharan African research-led Universities. This paper uses the institutional theory as the guiding theory to explore the conceptualization of academic research orientations at Makerere University. With the help of semi-structured interviews with 12 participants from 4 academic disciplines, the interpretive paradigm was preferred for this paper because the study phenomena are interpretive. As such, I chose to use qualitative methods, in which things are studied in their natural settings and to make sense of, or interpret, phenomena in terms of meanings people bring to them. The study results revealed that although academics engage in basic, policy-relevant, community-oriented, and entrepreneurial research, they as well seem to strongly understand research in terms of donor rules that exert conformance pressures and expectations. Based on the study findings, the conclusion is that research at Makerere University is largely conceptualized in terms of the donor-driven orientation. Among others, I recommend that the University should selectively collaborate with donors to ensure that locally generated research agendas are not overridden by the interests of the donors.
Downloads
References
AFRODAD (African Network on Debt and Development) (2007). A Critical assessment of aid management and harmonization in Tanzania: A case study. Harare
Anderson, R. (2010). The idea of a University today. History and Politics, 210-216.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Bentley, K., Habib, A., & Morrow, C. (2006). Academic freedom and institutional autonomy and the corporatized University in contemporary South Africa. Research report. Council on Higher Education (CHE), HEIAAF, 3. December 2006. Pretoria: CHE.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. 2nd edition. University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Bunting, I., Cloete, N., & Van Schalkwyk, F. (2014).An empirical overview of eight flagship Universities in Africa: 2001–2011. A Report of the Higher Education Research and Advocacy Network in Africa (HERANA). Cape Town: Centre for Higher Education Transformation.
Cherney, A., Head, B., Povey, J., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2013).The utilization of social science research: The perspective of academic researchers in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 252-270.
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited in: R. Bisaso (2011). Utilising the learning organization for management capacity building at Makerere University. A PhD dissertation presented at University of Tampere, November 18th, 2011.
Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining Change in Universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Maidenhead society for research into Higher Education and Open University Press. Berkshire, England.
Crespo, M., & H. Dridi, (2007). Intensification of University-industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54, 61-84.
Dean, L., Njelesani, J., Smith, H., & Bates, I. (2015). Promoting sustainable research partnerships: A mixed-method evaluation of a United Kingdom – Africa capacity-strengthening award scheme. Health Research Policy and Systems 13, 81
Del Favero, M. (2003). Academic Disciplines. In J.W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (pp. 9-14). New York: Macmillan.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powel, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147‐160.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as “quasi-firms”: the invention of the entrepreneurial University. Research Policy, 32, 109-121
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to the special issue on science policy dimensions of the triple helix of University-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 2-5.
Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of University-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
Gaillard, J.F. (1994). North-South partnership: Is collaboration possible between unequal partners? Knowledge and Policy, 7(2), 31-63.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Hakala, J. (2009). Academic cultures in Finnish mass research University. Change and continuity. Academic dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Research of the University of Tampere, Finland.
Hakala, J., & Ylijoki, O. H. (2001). Research for whom? Research orientations in three academic cultures. University of Tampere, Finland. Organization, 8(2), 373–380. doi: 1350-5084(200105)8:2;373–380;017781
Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740-760.
Ijeoma, J., Ibegbulam, A., & Eze U. J. (2016). Factors that contribute to research and publication output among librarians in Nigerian University libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 42 (2016), 15–20.
Ishengoma, J.M. (2016). North–South research collaborations and their impact on capacity building: A Southern perspective. In: T. Halvorsen and J. Nossum (2016). North–South knowledge networks: Towards equitable collaboration between academics, donors and Universities. African Minds. Cape Town, South Africa.
Jowi, J. O., & Obamba, M. (2011). Research and innovation management: Comparative analysis of Ghana, Kenya and Uganda. Draft Report, Paris: OECD
Kauppinen, I. (2014). Different meanings of ‘knowledge as commodity’ in the context of higher education. University of Jyvaskyla, Finland. Critical Sociology. 40(3), 393-409.
Kekale, J., & Lehikoinen, M. (2000). Quality and quality assessment in different disciplines. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Social Sciences. Psychological Reports 21.
Kockelmans, J.J. (Ed.). (1979). Internationality and higher education. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Lam, A. (2010). From 'ivory tower traditionalists' to 'entrepreneurial scientists'? Academic scientists in fuzzy University-industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307-340.
Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2008). In the know: Exploring the effect of geographical proximity on industry-University collaboration in the UK. Copenhagen Business School.
Lechuga, V.M., & Lechuga, D.C. (2012). Faculty motivation and scholarly work: Self-determination and self-regulation perspectives. Journal of the Professoriate, 6 (2).
Leisyte, L. (2007). University governance and academic research: Case studies of research units in Dutch and English Universities. PhD Dissertation submitted to the University of Twente.
Makerere University Directorate of Research and Graduate Training: The University research agenda (2013-2018).
Makerere University. (2008). Makerere University strategic plan 2008/09–2018/19. Kampala-Uganda: Planning and Development Department, Makerere University.
Makerere University. (2008c). Research and innovations policy, as approved by the University Council at its 112th meeting, 13 March 2008, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Mamdani, M. (2011). The Importance of research in a University. Makerere Institute of Social Research. Working Paper No.3. Retrieved from: http://misr.mak.ac.ug/publications/working-paperno- 3 -importance-research-University.
Massy, W. F. (2009).Academic values in the marketplace. Higher Education Management and policy. 2(3), 1-16.
Merton, R.K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. The University of Chicago Press.
Mouton, J. (2008). Research in Universities in sub-Saharan Africa: The challenge of scientific institution building. Harvard International Review.
Mouton, J. (2010). The state of social science in sub-Saharan Africa: World Social Science report. Knowledge divides Background paper, ISSC.
Mshoro, I., Galabawa, J., Baregu, M., Chijoriga, M., Kombe, W., & Toba, R. D. l. (2007). Overview of the UDSM five year rolling strategic plan 2007/2008 to 2011/2012. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam: University of Dar es Salaam.
Musiige, G. (2014). Research at Makerere University: Faculty perceptions towards the factors that influence research productivity. A master’s dissertation submitted to the University of Oslo.
Musiige, G., & Maassen, P. (2015). Faculty perceptions of the factors that influence research productivity at Makerere University. In N. Cloete, P. Maassen & T. Bailey (eds.), Knowledge production and contradictory functions in African higher education. African Minds Higher Education Dynamics Series (Vol.1).
Musoke, M. G. N., & Landoy, A. (2016). South–North collaboration and service enhancements at Makerere and Bergen University libraries. In: T. Halvorsen and J. Nossum (2016). North–South knowledge networks: Towards equitable collaboration between academics, donors and Universities. African Minds. Cape Town, South Africa.
Nakabugo, M.G., Barrett, E., McEvoy, O., & Munk, R. (2010). Best practices in North– South research partnerships in higher education: The Irish African partnership model. Policy and Practice: A Development Education Review 10, 89-89.
Nieminen, M. (2005). Academic research in change. Transformation of Finnish university policies and University research during the 1990s. Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145‐179
Pamfie, R., Guisca, S., & Bumba, R. (2014). Academic research: a catalyst for innovation process within companies in Romania. Bucharest University of economic Studies, Romania.
Reddy, P. (2011). The evolving role of University in economic development: The case of university-industry linkages. Springer International Development Research Centre. Ottawa Canada.
Scott, P. (1997). The changing role of University in the production of new knowledge. Tertiary Education and Management 3(1), 5-14.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ylijoki, O-H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of University research. Higher Education, 45(3), 307-335. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1022667923715.
Ylijoki, O-H., Lyytinen, A., & Marttila, L. (2011). Different research markets: a disciplinary perspective. Higher Education, 62(6), 721-740. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9414-2.
Zeleza, P. T. (2002). The politics of historical and social science research in Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 28 (1): 9 -23.
Ziman, J. (1996). Post-academic science: Constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies, 9, 67-80.
Ziman, J. (2000). Real Science. What it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
