Student Evaluation Of Lecturer Performance In Islamic University In Uganda Females’ Campus In Academic Year 2019-2020.

Abstract

This paper was based on measuring lecturers’ performance using assessment on the ERP system in academic year

2019-2020 as one of the ways to improve quality in teaching and learning in Islamic University in Uganda Females’

Campus (IUIUFC). The study analysed performance of lecturers in terms of personal attributes, preparation, course

assessment, and Time management, the relationship between personal attribute and course assessment of lecturers,

relationship between preparation and course assessment of lecturers and the relationship between time management

and course assessment of lecturers at IUIU females Campus. The study used an electronic approach that involved

both quantitative and qualitative methods to generate the information required for the evaluation. In addition, the

evaluation methodology utilized only primary sources of data. Analysis followed descriptive statistics (means) and

inferential statistics and the relationship objectives were assessed using spearman’s rank correlation for non-

parametric test since the data was in ordinal form. Results indicated that the average performance of lecturers in

terms of time management (3.9) was considerably higher, followed by preparation (3.8), personal attribute (3.8),

while course assessment (3.7), personal attributes of lecturers have a strong positive and significant relationship with

course assessment as indicated by a correlation value of 84.8% and a P-value (0.000). The Spearman’s rank

correlation results indicate that lecturers’ preparation has a strong positive and significant relationship with course

assessment (r=83%, P-value<0.01) and the results from the evaluation reveal that there is a strong positive and

significant relationship between time management and course assessment by lecturers (r=72.5%, P-value<0.01). The

evaluation findings show that lecturers have fairly improved in time management, followed by their preparation,

personal attribute while the course assessment (course deliverables like learning of students) is slightly below and

the study concluded that there should be close monitoring of lecturers to ensure that their intended deliverables are

met.